According to Manufacturing.net, Norway’s sovereign wealth fund announced Tuesday it will vote against CEO Elon Musk’s proposed compensation package that could pay him up to $1 trillion over the next decade. The fund, which manages Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global and holds a 1.16% stake in Tesla, specifically cited concerns about the “total size of the award, dilution, and lack of mitigation of key person risk.” This sets up a dramatic showdown at Tesla’s annual meeting Thursday where more than a dozen company proposals will be voted on. Meanwhile, Baron Capital Management with its 0.4% stake said Monday it will support the package, praising Musk as the “ultimate ‘key man'” whose interests align with shareholders. The proposed arrangement would grant Musk shares worth up to 12% of the company if Tesla hits ambitious performance targets including massive increases in car production, share price, and operating profit.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Great Institutional Divide
This isn’t just about one fund’s opinion – it’s revealing a fundamental split in how big investors view Musk’s role. On one side you have the Norwegians with their sober, risk-management approach. They’re basically saying “Yeah, he’s great, but this is too much.” Then you’ve got Baron Capital taking the “genius deserves whatever he wants” position. And honestly? Both sides have valid points.
Here’s the thing about that 1.16% stake – it might not sound huge, but in institutional investor terms, that’s massive. This isn’t some random hedge fund manager complaining. This is one of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds saying the governance here looks shaky. They’re worried about what happens if Musk gets hit by a bus – or more realistically, gets even more distracted by his other companies.
Where Musk Stands
Now let’s talk about Musk’s own position in all this. He already owns 15.79% of Tesla, making him the single largest shareholder. So he’s got massive skin in the game regardless. The proposed package would potentially boost his stake significantly over time, but is that really necessary for motivation?
I mean, think about it – the man is already one of the richest people on Earth. Does he really need another potential trillion dollars to stay focused? The counter-argument is that this isn’t about money per se, but about maintaining alignment as Tesla scales. Still, when you’re talking about numbers this astronomical, it’s hard not to question whether this is about incentives or just… excess.
What This Means for Investors
For regular Tesla shareholders, this vote is way more important than most annual meeting dramas. If this package goes through, it means significant dilution for everyone else. Your slice of the Tesla pie gets smaller so Musk’s can get bigger. The argument is that he’ll grow the whole pie so much that your smaller slice will still be worth more. But that’s a massive bet on one person’s continued genius.
And let’s be real – Tesla faces more competition now than ever. Chinese EV makers are coming hard, traditional automakers are finally getting serious about electric, and the whole autonomous driving space is getting crowded. Is now really the time to be handing out what might be the largest compensation package in corporate history?
Thursday’s Showdown
Thursday’s vote is going to be fascinating to watch. With institutional investors split like this, it could genuinely go either way. The Norwegians aren’t alone in their concerns – other governance-focused funds have been raising similar issues.
But Musk has his loyalists too, both among big investors and the retail crowd who see him as indispensable. The outcome will tell us a lot about whether Tesla shareholders see this as a company that can outgrow its founder, or whether they believe it’s Elon or bust. Either way, get your popcorn ready – this is corporate governance drama at its most entertaining.
