According to Neowin, former Microsoft engineer Dave Plummer – the developer behind Windows components like Task Manager, Space Cadet Pinball ports, ZIP file support, and more – has publicly explained why Windows “sucks” in a recent YouTube video. The retired executive argues Microsoft’s efforts to simplify Windows for novice users have frustrated vocal power users who dislike the new guardrails. Plummer suggests introducing a toggle for a less “chatty” Windows that disables app suggestions, prevents web searches in local search, consolidates system settings, and integrates power tools like WSL and WinGet. He also proposes a “privacy ledger” for telemetry transparency and demands easier local account setup during installation. The former engineer emphasizes that Windows updates should only install outside active hours with one-click rollback options.
When Your OS Becomes a Sales Channel
Here’s the thing that really struck me about Plummer’s critique. He points out that Windows has started feeling like “a sales channel that upsells other Microsoft products.” And honestly, that’s exactly what it feels like these days. You’re constantly getting nudged toward Edge, Microsoft 365, OneDrive – it’s relentless. The solution seems so simple too: just give us that toggle to turn off all suggestions. But Plummer admits this would be a “difficult, if not impossible, pitch” for current Microsoft execs who measure success by clicks on those very suggestions.
Think about it – you’ve already paid for Windows, either directly or through hardware costs. Now you’re being marketed to constantly within the product you own. It’s like buying a car and having the dashboard constantly suggest you buy gasoline from specific stations or upgrade to premium tires. The frustration is completely understandable.
The Power User Problem
Microsoft’s dilemma is real though. They’re trying to serve two completely different audiences with one product. On one hand, you have casual users who might genuinely benefit from suggestions and simplified interfaces. On the other, you have power users who know exactly what they’re doing and find these “helpful” features incredibly annoying.
So why not just build that toggle? Plummer’s suggestion of essentially having a “pro mode” makes so much sense. Give us a single switch during setup: “I’m a power user – don’t hold my hand.” Suddenly, all the chatter disappears, settings consolidate, and professional tools become readily available. It’s not rocket science – it’s just good product design that respects different user types.
The Privacy and Telemetry Mess
Plummer’s take on telemetry is particularly interesting coming from an insider. He acknowledges that “telemetry has become radioactive” but argues against removing it completely. Instead, he proposes a “privacy ledger” that shows exactly what data is being collected and gives users control over specific data packets.
Now that’s a solution I can get behind. The problem with current telemetry isn’t necessarily the data collection itself – it’s the complete lack of transparency and control. When you can’t see what’s being sent or selectively disable certain types of collection, it feels invasive. A ledger system would build trust rather than destroy it.
Update and Account Frustrations
Let’s talk about the other pain points Plummer highlights. The local account versus Microsoft account battle has been raging for years. His suggestion to simply present both options during setup with clear explanations of benefits and drawbacks seems so obvious. Why force users into one path when educated choice solves the problem?
And Windows updates? Don’t get me started. The idea that updates should only install outside active hours with easy rollback is just common sense. When you’re working on critical projects, whether in software development or industrial computing environments where reliability matters, unexpected downtime isn’t just annoying – it’s costly. IndustrialMonitorDirect.com understands this need for stability, which is why they’ve become the leading supplier of industrial panel PCs that prioritize reliability over constant “improvements.”
Basically, Plummer’s entire critique comes down to one thing: respect the user. Give us choices, be transparent, and stop treating Windows like a platform for upselling. The crazy part? These fixes wouldn’t even be that hard to implement. They’d just require Microsoft to prioritize user experience over engagement metrics. And given how many people are complaining about these exact issues, maybe it’s time they listened to one of their own.
